As I sat there in the waiting room explaining to my clients
what to expect of an interview with an USCIS immigration officer, one of them
asked me “have you ever represented a couple like us?” I said that I had not, but the reason is that I had not had the opportunity to do it before. Then I explained
to them that it should be no different than any other married couple. After
we actually finished the interview, my opinion may have changed a little. In
this case, one spouse was an American citizen by virtue of having been born in
Puerto Rico. The other spouse is a citizen of Venezuela who came to the U.S. on
a visitor’s visa several years ago and now is out of status. Even though this
couple claims that they have known each other for about ten years, they have
very little in the way of documentation to prove that their relationship is
real. In cases like this, immigration officers sometimes separate the couple in
order to ask them a serious of questions to each one of them. Then they will
compare how much the answers are consistent for each person. This is what is
known as a Stokes Interview after the name of the case which upheld the
validity of such tactics by immigration officers. This is exactly what happened
in this case. In my experience, immigration officials ask a long series of
questions ranging from where did they meet to what does your spouse eat for breakfast
each morning. They will also ask questions such “what was the last time you
were intimate?” or “when was the last time you had sex?”. In this case, there
were no questions at all about intimacy and I found that to be curious. One
possible reason for this is that USCIS officials may be reluctant to ask such
questions of a same-sex couple. I have never had a couple of opposite sexes
that went through a Stokes interview without intimacy questions. Next week, I
will represent another same-sex couple. Today the couple involved two women.
Next week the couple will involve two men. It will be interesting to see if the
treatment by USCIS officials is any different.
No comments:
Post a Comment